Menü

Publikationen

Leider konnte für diese Suchkombination kein Ergebnis gefunden werden

Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2023).
Mind the gap: Nowcasting the citation impact of research institutions. In ISSI (Hrsg.), Proceedings of ISSI 2023 – the 19th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (S. 441-447). Bloomington, United States: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Detection of (non-)existing participation in contested academic discourses.

Aman, V., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2023).
Detection of (non-)existing participation in contested academic discourses. In ISSI (Hrsg.), Proceedings of ISSI 2023 – the 19th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (S. 15-21). Bloomington, United States: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.

Synthesis report on gender differences in grant application behaviour.

Möller, T., Holzinger, F., Schön, L., Wedening, P., & Deixelberger, B. (2023).
Synthesis report on gender differences in grant application behaviour. Berlin: DZHW.
Abstract

This deliverable provides a summary of the findings of Work Package 7 of the GRANteD project. The results are based on seven online surveys carried out among researchers in six European countries. In Austria, Ireland, Poland, Slovakia and Sweden, applicants to specific research funding programs were surveyed. In Germany, a representative survey was conducted among academics as potential applicants at universities (DZHW Scientist Survey). In addition, the data of doctoral graduates of the DZHW PhD panel were analyzed. The overall findings indicates that there are hardly any gender differences in application behavior of academics.

What to do against gender bias in grant allocation?

van den Besselaar, P., Mom, C., Cruz-Castro, L., Sanz Menéndez, L., Möller, T., ... & Husu, L. (2023).
What to do against gender bias in grant allocation? Amsterdam: TMC.
Abstract

This text summarized the recommendations that can be distilled from the research done in the GRANteD project, and from the interactions with the Stakeholder Committee, the Scientific Advisory Board, and at other exchanges with researchers in the field and with stakeholders in different interactions.

What happens to science when it communicates openly?

Blümel, C., & Fecher, B. (31. Oktober 2023).
What happens to science when it communicates openly [Blogbeitrag]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10037220
Abstract

The contribution deals with what happens when science opens up and communicates’ and the emerging challenges for future scientific communication.

Identifying and explaining gender differences in grant decision outcomes: The results of the case studies.

Möller, T., van den Besselaar, P., Cruz-Castro, L., Sanz Menéndez, L., Sandström, U., & Mom, C. (2023).
Identifying and explaining gender differences in grant decision outcomes: The results of the case studies. Berlin, Amsterdam: DZHW / TMC (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Gender and grants: lessons from nine cases in six European countries.

Möller, T., & van den Besselaar, P. (2023).
Gender and grants: lessons from nine cases in six European countries. Berlin, Amsterdam: DZHW / TMC (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Gender differences in grant application behaviour.

Möller, T., Holzinger, F., & Schön, L. (2023).
Gender differences in grant application behaviour. Berlin, Wien: DZHW / JR (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Evidenznutzung an Hochschulen/Forschungseinrichtungen und in der Hochschul- und Forschungspolitik – Protokoll eines Scoping Reviews.

Wegner, A., & Thiedig, C. (2023).
Evidenznutzung an Hochschulen/Forschungseinrichtungen und in der Hochschul- und Forschungspolitik – Protokoll eines Scoping Reviews. Berlin: ZENODO. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10034215
Abstract

Dieses Dokument beschreibt protokollhaft die Ziele und das methodische Vorgehen eines Scoping Reviews. Im Rahmen des Reviews werden deutsch- und englischsprachige empirische Studien gesichtet, die sich mit Einflussfaktoren auf die Nutzung von Evidenz im Hochschul- und Wissenschaftssektor befassen.

Preprints in the German news media before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A comparative mixed-method analysis.

Simons, A., & Schniedermann, A. (2023).
Preprints in the German news media before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A comparative mixed-method analysis. In I. Broer, S. Lemke, A. Mazarakis, I. Peters, & C. Zinke-Wehlmann (Hrsg.), The Science-Media Interface. On the Relation Between Internal and External Science Communication (S. 53-78). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Saur (online first). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110776546-003
Abstract

Mainstream media widely references scientific publications for claims of factuality and authority. But how did science journalism deal with the sudden surge in preprint publications that provided rapid but often uncertain knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic? While several studies have investigated various aspects of preprint-based science communication, only a few have focused on the public discourse in Germany, albeit with substantial challenges and controversies. In this mixed-method study, we identified the usage of preprints for 1,006 in about 390,000 German news stories, qualitatively analyzed the contexts of these preprints, and developed codes that reflect the epistemic sentiments. We further compared ...

Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland.

Ploder, M., Müller, R., & Blümel, C. (2023).
Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland. Eine Studie im Auftrag der VolkswagenStiftung. Hannover: VolkswagenStiftung.
Abstract

Die VolkswagenStiftung baut einen neuen Profilbereich „Wissen über Wissen“ auf, mit dem sie Impulse zur strukturellen Verbesserung von Wissenschaft in Deutschland geben wird. Im Rahmen des Projekts „Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland“ wurde untersucht, wie Wissenschaftler*innen in verschiedenen Forschungsfeldern das Arbeiten und Leben am Wissenschaftsstandort Deutschland wahrnehmen und welche Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen sie für Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland ausmachen. Ziel war es, eine aktuelle Zustands- und Problembeschreibung zu erarbeiten, aus der sich Ideen für die Fördertätigkeit der Stiftung sowie für einen positiven Wandel in den Wissenschaftskulturen in Deutschland ableiten lassen.

Guideline Impact Factor – A new indicator to assess journals cited in medical guidelines.

Aman, V., & Sorgatz, N. (2023).
Guideline Impact Factor – A new indicator to assess journals cited in medical guidelines. 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). https://doi.org/10.55835/644169a0565e92f0541abf8d

Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality.

Stephen, D. (2023).
Distinguishing articles in questionable and non-questionable journals using quantitative indicators associated with quality. In L. Waltman, K. H. Lai, B. Murat, J. Wang, V. Weimer, E. Noyons, & M. Luwel (Hrsg.), 27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023). Leiden, Netherlands: orvium.io. https://doi.org/10.55835/644245cb8e703ddb4dc07eda

Market selection and learning under model misspecification.

Bottazzi, G., Giachini, D., & Ottaviani, M. (2023).
Market selection and learning under model misspecification. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control2023. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165188923001458 (Abgerufen am: 12.09.2023).
Abstract

The paper explores market selection in an Arrow-Debreu economy with complete markets where agents learn over misspecified models. Standard Bayesian learning loses formal justification, and biased learning processes may provide a selection advantage. The ecology of traders in the market affects selection dynamics and long-run asset valuation. Model misspecification makes it difficult to rank learning behaviors based on survival prospects. Prediction averaging has an advantage when the true data generating process belongs to the same family of models, but this advantage disappears when the true model belongs to a more general class. Rules guaranteeing survival exploit imitative mechanisms.

What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation.

Thelwall, M., Simrick, S., Viney, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2023).
What is research funding, how does it influence research, and how is it recorded? Key dimensions of variation. Scientometrics , 128, 6085-6106.
Abstract

Evaluating the effects of some or all academic research funding is difficult because of the many different and overlapping sources, types, and scopes. It is therefore important to identify the key aspects of research funding so that funders and others assessing its value do not overlook them. This article outlines 18 dimensions through which funding varies substantially, as well as three funding records facets.

Kontakt

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Kommissar. Abteilungsleitung 030 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Kommissar. Abteilungsleitung 030 2064177-18
Peter van den Besselaar
Prof. Dr. Peter van den Besselaar Kommissar. Abteilungsleitung 030 2064177-0
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Stellv. Abteilungsleitung 030 2064177-24

Projekte

Alle Abteilungsprojekte

Mitarbeiter*innen

Alle Abteilungsmitarbeiter*innen

Publikationen

Alle Abteilungspublikationen

Vorträge und Tagungen

Alle Abteilungsvorträge und -tagungen