Publikationen
853 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-853
Alphabetical author order and co-author contributions in mathematics.Donner, P., & Korytkowski, P. (2025).Alphabetical author order and co-author contributions in mathematics. Scientometrics (online first). Abstract
In this study we investigate the relative contributions of co-authors to publications in mathematics. Mathematics is an interesting case for such research because it is one of only a few scientific disciplines in which alphabetical order of names of co-authors on publications is still the prevailing convention rather than contribution-based order. The study is based on unique data of publicly available author-provided quantitative contribution statements for co-authored papers from applications for habilitation degrees in Poland. [...] |
As open as possible, but as closed as necessary: Openness in innovation policy.Cruz Romero, R. (2025).As open as possible, but as closed as necessary: Openness in innovation policy. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 40(3), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.13169/Prometheus.40.3.0004 |
Open Research Tools: Stand und Herausforderungen im Spannungsfeld von Forschungssoftware, Offenheit und digitaler Infrastruktur.Streicher, J., Schütz, M., Blümel, C., & Schniedermann, A. (2025).Open Research Tools: Stand und Herausforderungen im Spannungsfeld von Forschungssoftware, Offenheit und digitaler Infrastruktur. Graz, Wien, Klagenfurt: Joanneum Research. Abstract
Digitale Werkzeuge, Software und damit verbundene Infrastrukturen sind zentral für die moderne Wissenschaft. Mit Blick auf eine offene Wissenschaft (Open Science) gewinnen offene Software-Werkzeuge oder „Tools“ zunehmend an Bedeutung, da sie die Zusammenarbeit, die Reproduzierbarkeit und den Zugang zu Ressourcen fördern und unterstützen. Forschende tragen aktiv zur Entwicklung dieser „Open Research Tools (ORT)“ bei und gestalten damit die digitale Transformation des Wissenschaftssystems mit. Auch in Deutschland ist dieser Wandel spürbar, wobei hier der Bereich Forschungssoftware an Bedeutung gewinnt. Ziel der Studie ist es,... |
Projekt DiTraP: Disziplinenspezifische Wissenstransferpraktiken.Janßen, M., & Just, A. (2025).Projekt DiTraP: Disziplinenspezifische Wissenstransferpraktiken. In A. Eickelmann, J. Henke, B. Krieger, U. Schmoch, J. Spanjol, & F. Witzigmann (Hrsg.), Erfolgreiche Gestaltung von Wissenstransfer an Hochschulen. Ein Leitfaden für Hochschulleitungen und Wissenschaftsministerien (S. 13-20). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI. |
Small open access publishers: An analysis of visibility and impact patterns.Cruz Romero, R. (2025).Small open access publishers: An analysis of visibility and impact patterns. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2342-2350). Yerevan, Armenia: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI). |
Structural and institutional determinants of Open Access publishing: A macro-perspective.Cruz Romero, R., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2025).Structural and institutional determinants of Open Access publishing: A macro-perspective. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2351-2360). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI). |
Are citation context information stronger related to peer ratings than citation counts? A descriptive analysis.Donner, P., Stahlschmidt, S., Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2025).Are citation context information stronger related to peer ratings than citation counts? A descriptive analysis. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 325-332). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Abstract
In this study, we investigated whether citation context information is able to increase the validity of citation impact analyses to measure research quality compared to simple citation counts. We analyzed the statistical relationships of information extracted from structured citation context data in the Web of Science (Clarivate) such as the placement of citations within specific sections of an article with post-publication peer review quality ratings from Faculty Opinions (H1 connect), used as an external validity criterion for research quality. The study is based on publications in medicine and life sciences. [...] |
Egocentric attribution bias in formal co-author contribution statements and bibliometric counting method validity.Donner, P. (2025).Egocentric attribution bias in formal co-author contribution statements and bibliometric counting method validity. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
The impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict on international migration of Russian‐affiliated researchers.Lovakov, A. (2025).The impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict on international migration of Russian‐affiliated researchers. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 1730-1738). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
Guidance List for Reporting Bibliometric Analyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi study.Ng, J. Y., Liu, H., Masood, M., Syed, N., Waltman, L., ... & Moher, D. (2025).Guidance List for Reporting Bibliometric Analyses (GLOBAL): A two-round modified Delphi study. In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 868-884). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
Ko-Publikationen für das Monitoring internationaler Hochschulkooperationen: Aussagekraft, Datenquellen und Datennutzung.Stahlschmidt, S. (2025).Ko-Publikationen für das Monitoring internationaler Hochschulkooperationen: Aussagekraft, Datenquellen und Datennutzung. Sitzung der KMK Bund-Länder AG „Indikatoren“. |
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness?
Implicit reporting standards in bibliometric research: What can reviewers' comments tell us about reporting completeness? In S. Sargsyan, W. Glänzel, & G. Abramo (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2025) (S. 2199-2206). Yerevan: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. |
A decision model for it-supported research management based on cutting-edge data science technologies.Azeroual, O., & Störl, U. (2025).A decision model for it-supported research management based on cutting-edge data science technologies. In C.S. Londhe, N.S. Bhatt, & N. Kitsing (Hrsg.), Information Systems for Intelligent Systems. ISBM 2024. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (S. 315-330). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1206-2_25 |
Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine.Ng, J. Y., Stephen, D., Liu, J., Ostermann, T., Robinson, N., & Cramer, H. (2025).Bibliometrics and altmetrics in the context of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine. Integrative Medicine Research (online first). |
Kontakt
