Publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Analysing Sentiments in Peer Review Reports: Evidence from Two Science Funding Agencies.

Luo, J., Feliciani, T., Reinhart, M., Hartstein, J., Das, V., Alabi, O., & Shankar, K. (2021).
Analysing Sentiments in Peer Review Reports: Evidence from Two Science Funding Agencies. Quantitative Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00156

Hochschulreformen, Leistungsbewertungen und berufliche Identität von Professor*innen.

Janßen, M., Schimank, U., & Sondermann, A. (2021).
Hochschulreformen, Leistungsbewertungen und berufliche Identität von Professor*innen. Eine fächervergleichende qualitative Studie. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33289-1

Research Networks Generated by Organizational Structures, Co-Authorships and Citations: A Case Study of German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (Idiv).

Qu, Z. (2021).
Research Networks Generated by Organizational Structures, Co-Authorships and Citations: A Case Study of German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (Idiv). Open Access Journal of Biogeneric Science and Research, 2021(9).

The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects.

Gläser, J., Ash, M., Buenstorf, G., Hopf, D., Hubenschmid, L., ... & Lieb, K. (2021).
The Independence of Research—A Review of Disciplinary Perspectives and Outline of Interdisciplinary Prospects. Minerva, 2021 (online first). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-021-09451-8

Leistungsfähig und zufrieden? Unbefristete und befristete Postdocs im Vergleich.

Kauhaus, H., Stiegler, A., & Fabian, G. (2021).
Leistungsfähig und zufrieden? Unbefristete und befristete Postdocs im Vergleich. Forschung & Lehre, 2021(09), 736-738.

Gizasks: What Is the Most Important Scientific Development of the Last 50 Years?

Hesselmann, F. (30. August 2021).
Gizasks: What Is the Most Important Scientific Development of the Last 50 Years [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://gizmodo.com/what-is-the-most-important-scientific-development-of-th-1847518361

Wissenschaftskommunikation in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer Befragung unter Wissenschaftler*innen.

Ziegler, R., Fischer, L., Ambrasat, J., Fabian, G., Niemann, P., & Buz, C. (2021).
Wissenschaftskommunikation in Deutschland - Ergebnisse einer Befragung unter Wissenschaftler*innen. Berlin/Karlsruhe: DZHW, WiD, NaWik.

Bibliometrische Standardberichte für wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen und deren Einsatz an Bibliotheken.

Stahlschmidt, S., Donner, P., & Jahn, N. (2021).
Bibliometrische Standardberichte für wissenschaftliche Einrichtungen und deren Einsatz an Bibliotheken. b.i.t. online, 24(3), 269-276.

Bewertung in und durch digitale Infrastrukturen.

Krüger, A. K., Heßelmann, F., & Hartstein, J. (2021).
Bewertung in und durch digitale Infrastrukturen. In F. Meier & T. Peetz (Hrsg.), Organisation und Bewertung (S. 97-124). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31549-8_5

Differences between Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions in structure and citation networks affect German sectors’ normalised citation impact.

Stahlschmidt, S., & Stephen, D. (2021).
Differences between Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions in structure and citation networks affect German sectors’ normalised citation impact. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rosseau (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (S. 1051-1062). Leuven: KU Leuven / International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.).

Broad shouldered - publication formats served by doctoral students.

Tesch, J. (2021).
Broad shouldered - publication formats served by doctoral students. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (ISSI 2021), Leuven, Belgium, 12 July to 15 July, 2021, 1545-1546.

A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping.

Seitz, C., Schmidt, M., Schwichtenberg, N., & Velden, T. (2021).
A Case Study of the Epistemic Function of Citations - Implications for Citation-based Science Mapping. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (S. 1027-1032). Leuven: KU Leuven / International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.).
Abstract

The use of citations as indicators of topical relatedness of publications is common in the algorithmic mapping of the structure of science. References to source documents, however, may serve a variety of epistemic functions, and hence represent rather different dimensions of topical relatedness, such as the research methods used, the empirical objects studied, the theoretical resources build on, the research questions pursued, or the external motivation for and relevance of the work. In this case study, we explore the diversity in topical dimensions along which publications are linked in citation networks, by coding the epistemic function of in-text citations. [...]

Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9.

Schmidt, M., Kircheis, W., Simons, A., Potthast, M., & Stein, B. (2021).
Does Wikipedia Cover the Relevant Literature on Major Innovations Timely? An Exploratory Case Study of CRISPR/Cas9. In W. Glänzel, S. Heeffer, P.-S. Chi, & R. Rousseau (Hrsg.), 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics - Proceedings (S. 1021-1026). Leuven: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (I.S.S.I.).

Trustworthy or not? Research data on COVID-19 in data repositories.

Azeroual, O., & Schöpfel, J. (2021).
Trustworthy or not? Research data on COVID-19 in data repositories. In D. Baker & L. Ellis (Hrsg.), Libraries, Digital Information, and COVID: Practical Applications and Approaches to Challenge and Change (S. 169-182). Cambridge, Kidlington: Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88493-8.00027-6

Sichtbarkeitskonstellationen im Journal Peer Review - Konsequenzen von In/Transparenz in wissenschaftlichen Bewertungsverfahren.

Hesselmann, F., Schendzielorz, C., & Krüger, A. (2021).
Sichtbarkeitskonstellationen im Journal Peer Review - Konsequenzen von In/Transparenz in wissenschaftlichen Bewertungsverfahren. In O. Berli, S. Nicolae, & H. Schäfer (Hrsg.), Bewertungskulturen (S. 71-92). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Peter van den Besselaar
Prof. Dr. Peter van den Besselaar Acting Head +49 30 2064177-0
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24
Manuela Rosati
Manuela Rosati Assistant +49 30 2064177-0

Projects

All research area projects

Staff

All research area staff

Publications

All research area publications

Presentations and conferences

All research area presentations and conferences