Publications

Unfortunately, there is no result available for this search combination

Legal aspects and data protection in relation to the CRIS system.

Zendulková, D., & Azeroual, O. (2022).
Legal aspects and data protection in relation to the CRIS system. In M.-A. Sicilia, P. de Castro, S. Vancauwenbergh, E. Simons, & O. Ognjen (Hrsg.), 15th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (S. 17-27). Dubrovnik, Croatia: Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.172

Combining Data Lake and Data Wrangling for Ensuring Data Quality in CRIS.

Azeroual, O., Schöpfel, J., Ivanovic, D., & Nikiforova, A. (2022).
Combining Data Lake and Data Wrangling for Ensuring Data Quality in CRIS. In M.-A. Sicilia, P. de Castro, S. Vancauwenbergh, E. Simons, & O. Ognjen (Hrsg.), 15th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (S. 3-16). Dubrovnik, Croatia: Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.171

Drawbacks of Normalization by Percentile Ranks in Citation Impact Studies.

Donner, P. (2022).
Drawbacks of Normalization by Percentile Ranks in Citation Impact Studies. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 20(2), 75-93.
Abstract

This paper discusses drawbacks of the percentile rank method for citation impact normalization which have hitherto been neglected in the bibliometrics literature. The transformation of citation counts to percentile ranks changes ratio scale data into ordinal scale data, for which the notions of the ratio between two values and of the magnitude of a difference between two values are not defined – a substantial loss of information. This distorts citation data particularly severely because the differences between citation counts adjacent in order in publication sets are greater for more highly cited publications and because highly cited publications are more scarce than non-highly cited ones. [...]

Management von Forschungsinformationen in Hochschulen und Forschungseinrichtungen - Eine Standortbestimmung 2022.

Beucke, D., Biesenbender, S., Ebert, B., Friedrichsen, E., Hauschke, C., ... & Tobias, R. (2022).
Management von Forschungsinformationen in Hochschulen und Forschungseinrichtungen - Eine Standortbestimmung 2022. DINI Schriften 22 -de. Göttingen: Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation e. V. (DINI). https://doi.org/10.18452/25440

Putting FAIR Principles in the Context of Research Information: FAIRness for CRIS and CRIS for FAIRness.

Azeroual, O., Schöpfel, J., Pölönen, J., & Nikiforova, A. (2022).
Putting FAIR Principles in the Context of Research Information: FAIRness for CRIS and CRIS for FAIRness. In J. Bernardino, E. Masciari, C. Rolland, & J. Filipe (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - KMIS, October 24-26, 2022, in Valletta, Malta (S. 63-71). Lisboa - Portugal: Institute for Systems and Technologies of Information, Control and Communication (INSTICC) - **Best Paper Award**. https://doi.org/10.5220/0011548700003335

Helpdesk zur Unterstützung der Einführung des Kerndatensatz Forschung: Dokumentation des Projekts.

Biesenbender, S. (2022).
Helpdesk zur Unterstützung der Einführung des Kerndatensatz Forschung: Dokumentation des Projekts. Berlin: DZHW.

Grenzen und Chancen der Offenheit? Was Technologiesouveränität und Geopolitik für Innovation in Forschung und Technologie bedeuten.

Blümel, C., Kessler, M. S., & Skupien, S. (2022).
Symposium Grenzen und Chancen der Offenheit? Was Technologiesouveränität und Geopolitik für Innovation in Forschung und Technologie bedeuten im Rahmen der Veranstaltung Grenzen und Chancen der Offenheit, Stifterverband e.V., Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW), Berlin University Alliance, Center for Open and responsible Research (CORe), Berlin.

Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Forschungsberichterstattung: Nutzung und Umsetzung des KDSF - Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland.

Biesenbender, S., Herwig, S., Kramer, M., & Petersohn, S. (2022).
Workshop Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Forschungsberichterstattung: Nutzung und Umsetzung des KDSF - Standard für Forschungsinformationen in Deutschland im Rahmen der 19. FORTRAMA-Jahrestagung, Netzwerk Forschungs- und Transfermanagement e.V. (FORTRAMA), Potsdam.

Universities vs. research institutes? Overcoming the Soviet legacy of higher education and research.

Lovakov, A., Chankseliani, M., & Panova, A. (2022).
Universities vs. research institutes? Overcoming the Soviet legacy of higher education and research. Scientometrics, 2022 (127), 6293-6313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04527-y

Workshop-Bericht: Expertinnen- und Expertenworkshop des Projektes BERTI zur Diskussion des Kompetenzmodells der digital gestützten Forschungsberichterstattung.

Petersohn, S. (10. Oktober 2022).
Workshop-Bericht: Expertinnen- und Expertenworkshop des Projektes BERTI zur Diskussion des Kompetenzmodells der digital gestützten Forschungsberichterstattung [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://blogs.tib.eu/wp/dini-ag-blog/2022/10/10/workshop-bericht-berti/

‘I want to be able to do what I know the tools will allow us to do’: Practicing evaluative bibliometrics through digital infrastructure.

Krüger, A. K., & Petersohn, S. (2022).
‘I want to be able to do what I know the tools will allow us to do’: Practicing evaluative bibliometrics through digital infrastructure. Research Evaluation (online first).
Abstract

The proliferation of quantitative research assessment has been accompanied by an increasing growth and diversification of digital infrastructure for evaluative bibliometrics. Since the beginning of the 2000s, insights into academic performance provided by a variety of new databases and devices significantly exceed the capacities of the former Science Citation Index and embedded metrics. Going beyond the research on the construction, uses, and consequences of bibliometric indicators, we therefore posit that a perspective on bibliometric infrastructure is crucial for understanding how evaluative bibliometrics is put into practice.

„Zwang ist nie gut, weil er die intrinsische Motivation killt“.

Adrian, D., & Bozukova, M. (22. September 2022).
„Zwang ist nie gut, weil er die intrinsische Motivation killt“ [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://www.wissenschaftskommunikation.de/zwang-ist-nie-gut-weil-er-die-intrinsische-motivation-killt-61843/

Wissenschaftsrecht.

Speiser, G. (Hrsg.) (2022).
Wissenschaftsrecht. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64722-6

Two Longitudinal Papers Concerning Gender Disparities in Science Careers.

Sandström, U., Sandström, E., Mom, C., van den Besselaar, P., & Möller, T. (2022).
Two Longitudinal Papers Concerning Gender Disparities in Science Careers. Stockholm, Amsterdam, Berlin: Forskningspolitik Sverige AB, TMC BV, DZHW (nicht zur Veröffentlichung vorgesehen).

Do authorship regulations in performance-based funding systems affect authorship practices? A case study of German medical faculties.

Aman, V. (2022).
Do authorship regulations in performance-based funding systems affect authorship practices? A case study of German medical faculties. 26th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6912639

Contact

Clemens Blümel
Clemens Blümel Acting Head +49 30 2064177-31
Stephan Stahlschmidt
Dr. Stephan Stahlschmidt Acting Head +49 30 2064177-18
Peter van den Besselaar
Prof. Dr. Peter van den Besselaar Acting Head +49 30 2064177-0
Guido Speiser
Dr. Guido Speiser Deputy Head +49 30 2064177-24

Projects

All research area projects

Staff

All research area staff

Publications

All research area publications

Presentations and conferences

All research area presentations and conferences