Publications
744 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-744
NoSQL Security: Can My Data-driven Decision-making Be Influenced from Outside?Nikiforova, A., Daskevics, A., & Azeroual, O. (2023).NoSQL Security: Can My Data-driven Decision-making Be Influenced from Outside? In A. Visvizi, O. Troisi, & M. Grimaldi (Hrsg.), Big Data and Decision-Making: Applications and Uses in the Public and Private Sector (Emerald Studies in Politics and Technology) (S. 59-73). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80382-551-920231005 |
Aktualisierung des Mappings des Gemeinsamen Vokabulars zum KDSF.Biesenbender, S., Höhner, K., & Herwig, S. (16. Januar 2023).Aktualisierung des Mappings des Gemeinsamen Vokabulars zum KDSF [Blogbeitrag]. https://doi.org/10.57689/DINI-BLOG.20230116 |
Promotionen an Hochschulen für angewandte Wissenschaften – Impulse für das Monitoring und die Qualitätssicherung.Wegner, A. (2022).Promotionen an Hochschulen für angewandte Wissenschaften – Impulse für das Monitoring und die Qualitätssicherung. Qualität in der Wissenschaft (QiW), 2022 (3+4), 67-72. |
From Research Evaluation to Research Analytics. The digitization of academic performance measurement.Krüger, A. K., & Petersohn, S. (2022).From Research Evaluation to Research Analytics. The digitization of academic performance measurement. Valuation Studies, 9 (1), 11-46. https://doi.org/10.3384/VS.2001-5992.2022.9.1.11-46 Abstract
Since the 2000s, the digitization of bibliometric infrastructure has accelerated at a rapid pace. In this article, we analyse how these developments in evaluative bibliometrics have contributed to an extension of indicator-based research evaluation towards data-driven research analytics. Drawing on empirical material from blogs and websites as well as from research and policy papers, we discuss how interoperability, scalability, and flexibility as material specificities of digital infrastructures generate new ways of data production and their assessment, which affect the possibilities of how academic performance can be understood and (e)valuated. |
Wissenstransfer durch international mobile Forschende – Befunde bibliometrischer Analysen.Aman, V. (2022).Wissenstransfer durch international mobile Forschende – Befunde bibliometrischer Analysen. DAAD Forschung kompakt, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.46685/DAADStudien.2022.12 |
Neuigkeiten rund um den KDSF: Version 1.3. veröffentlicht.Petersohn, S. (19. Dezember 2022).Neuigkeiten rund um den KDSF: Version 1.3. veröffentlicht [Blogbeitrag]. Abgerufen von https://blogs.tib.eu/wp/dini-ag-blog/2022/12/19/kdsf-version-1-3-veroeffentlicht/ |
Landscape study of small journal publishers for the Knowledge Exchange Task & Finish Group for " Small Publishers and the Transition to Open Access " .Stephen, D., & Stahlschmidt, S. (2022).Landscape study of small journal publishers for the Knowledge Exchange Task & Finish Group for "Small Publishers and the Transition to Open Access". Berlin: DZHW.
|
Methodenbericht zur Befragung von wissenschaftlichen und administrativen Beschäftigten an medizinischen Fakultäten im Projekt QuaMedFo (Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung).Biesenbender, S., Hartstein, J., Herrmann-Lingen, C., Kratzenberg, A., & Traylor, C. (2022).Methodenbericht zur Befragung von wissenschaftlichen und administrativen Beschäftigten an medizinischen Fakultäten im Projekt QuaMedFo (Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:qmf2021-dmr:1.0.0 Abstract
The survey of scientific and administrative employees at medical faculties in Germany is part of module 7 „Praktikabilität, Akzeptanz und Verhaltenswirksamkeit“ in the collaborative project „Qualitätsmaße zur Evaluierung medizinischer Forschung“ (QuaMedFo). It was planned and conducted in close cooperation of the German Center for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW) and the Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG) in the first half of 2021. Data preparation was completed in the second half of 2021. https://doi.org/10.21249/DZHW:qmf2021:1.0.0 |
Competency requirements in research information management and reporting: evidence from a national survey in Germany.Schelske, S., & Thiedig, C. (2022).Competency requirements in research information management and reporting: evidence from a national survey in Germany. Procedia Computer Science (211), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.186 |
Research Information Systems and Ethics relating to Open Science.Schöpfel, J., Azeroual, O., & de Castro, P. (2022).Research Information Systems and Ethics relating to Open Science. In M.-A. Sicilia, P. de Castro, S. Vancauwenbergh, E. Simons, & O. Ognjen (Hrsg.), 15th International Conference on Current Research Information Systems (S. 36-46). Dubrovnik, Croatia: Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.174 |