Publications
876 Übereinstimmungen gefunden / 1-15 16-30 31-45 46-60 61-75 76-90 91-105 106-120 121-135 136-150 151-165 166-180 181-195 196-210 211-225 226-240 241-255 256-270 271-285 286-300 301-315 316-330 331-345 346-360 361-375 376-390 391-405 406-420 421-435 436-450 451-465 466-480 481-495 496-510 511-525 526-540 541-555 556-570 571-585 586-600 601-615 616-630 631-645 646-660 661-675 676-690 691-705 706-720 721-735 736-750 751-765 766-780 781-795 796-810 811-825 826-840 841-855 856-870 871-876
Die Finanzierungs- und Beschäftigungssituation Promovierender: Aktuelle Ergebnisse der National Academics Panel Study.Wegner, A. (2020).Die Finanzierungs- und Beschäftigungssituation Promovierender: Aktuelle Ergebnisse der National Academics Panel Study. (DZHW Brief 4|2020). Hannover: DZHW. https://doi.org/10.34878/2020.04.dzhw_brief |
The implicit preference of bibliometrics for basic research.Donner, P., & Schmoch, U. (2020).The implicit preference of bibliometrics for basic research. Scientometrics, 124, 1411-1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03516-3 Abstract
By individually associating articles to basic or applied research, it is shown that basic articles are cited more frequently than applied ones. Dividing the subject categories of the Web of Science into a basic and an applied part, the mean field-normalization rate is referred to the applied or basic part depending on the research orientation of the paper analysed. By this approach, a distinct difference of the citations for the applied and basic parts of most subject categories is found. However, differences of the citation scores of applied and basic research organisations are found as well, but are less clear. The explanation is that applied and basic research organisations generally publish a mix of basic and applied articles. [...] |
Die Regierung der Wissenschaft im Peer Review.Schendzielorz, C., & Reinhart, M. (2020).Die Regierung der Wissenschaft im Peer Review. der moderne Staat- Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 1/2020, 101-123. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v13i1.10 |
Assessing the Organizational Climate for Translational Research with a New Survey Tool.Simons, A., Riedel, N., Toelch, U., Hendriks, B., Ohlraun, S., Liebenau, L., ... & Reinhart, M. (2020).Assessing the Organizational Climate for Translational Research with a New Survey Tool. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/mjg7t |
The independence of research - a review of disciplinary perspectives and outline of interdisciplinary prospects.Gläser, J., Ash, M., Bunstorf, G., Hopf, D., Hubenschmid, L., Janßen, M., ... & Lieb, K. (2020).The independence of research - a review of disciplinary perspectives and outline of interdisciplinary prospects. 1/2020. Berlin: TU Berlin. |
A validation of coauthorship credit models with empirical data from the contributions of PhD candidates.Donner, P. (2020).A validation of coauthorship credit models with empirical data from the contributions of PhD candidates. Quantitative Science Studies, 1 (2), 551-564. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00048 Abstract
A perennial problem in bibliometrics is the appropriate distribution of authorship credit for coauthored publications. Several credit allocation methods and formulas have been introduced, but there has been little empirical validation as to which method best reflects the typical contributions of coauthors. This paper presents a validation of credit allocation methods using a new data set of author-provided percentage contribution figures obtained from the coauthored publications in cumulative PhD theses by authors from three countries that contain contribution statements. [...] |
Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups.Akbaritabar, A., Traag, V.A., Caimo, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2020).Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups. Scientometrics. [online first]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w |
Gender patterns of publication in top sociological journals.Akbaritabar, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2020).Gender patterns of publication in top sociological journals. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0162243920941588 |
Data Wrangling in Database Systems: Purging of Dirty Data.Azeroual, O. (2020).Data Wrangling in Database Systems: Purging of Dirty Data. Data, 6/2020, 50. Basel: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/data5020050 |
References to literature from the business sector in patent documents: A case study of charging technologies for electric vehicles.Qu, Z., & Zhang, S. (2020).References to literature from the business sector in patent documents: A case study of charging technologies for electric vehicles. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03518-1 |
Reformopfer? Nicht wirklich! „New Public Management“, „Bologna“, die „Exzellenzinitiative“ – und die deutschen ProfessorInnen.Schimank, U., & Janßen, M. (2020).Reformopfer? Nicht wirklich! „New Public Management“, „Bologna“, die „Exzellenzinitiative“ – und die deutschen ProfessorInnen. In Behrenbeck, S., Sager, K., & Schmidt, U. (Hrsg.), „Die ganze Hochschule soll es sein“. Wolff-Dietrich Webler zum 80. Geburtstag. Bielefeld: UVW Universitäts Verlag Webler. |
How to Inspect and Measure Data Quality about Scientific Publications: Use Case of Wikipedia and CRIS Databases.Azeroual, O., & Lewoniewski, W. (2020).How to Inspect and Measure Data Quality about Scientific Publications: Use Case of Wikipedia and CRIS Databases. Algorithms, 4/2020, 107, Basel, Switzerland: MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/a13050107 |
Contact
