A Conceptual Framework: An internal working paper defining the conceptual framework for the case studies.
Rungius, C. (2018).
A Conceptual Framework: An internal working paper defining the conceptual framework for the case studies. Deliverable 2.5, Berlin/Innsbruck/Vienna: S4D4C.
|
Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek.
Thiedig, C. (2018).
Der Kerndatensatz Forschung: Aufbau, Anwendung und die Rolle der Bibliothek. GMS Medizin — Bibliothek — Information, 18(3) 2018.
|
Elicitive Ansätze in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.
Rungius, C. (2018).
Elicitive Ansätze in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Bonn: lehrgut.hypotheses.org.
|
Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship.
Rauhut, H., Winter, F., & Johann, D. (2018).
Does the Winner Take it All? Increasing Inequality in Scientific Authorship. In M. C. Buchmann & R. A. Scott (Hrsg.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0459
|
Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science.
Azeroual, O., Saake, G., Abuosba, M., & Schöpfel, J. (2018).
Text data mining and data quality management for research information systems in the context of open data and open science. In ESI-CNRST, N. Ibnlkhayat (Hrsg.), Proceedings of 3rd International Colloquium on Open Access - Open Access to Science Foundations, Issues and Dynamics (29-46), 28-30 November 2018, Rabat-Morocco, 11/2018.
|
Using Argumentation Visualization to Foster Transparency of Development Processes: An Evaluation Study.
Riechert, M., Biesenbender, S., Becker, J., & Zarnekow, R. (2018).
Using Argumentation Visualization to Foster Transparency of Development Processes: An Evaluation Study. Research Papers in Information Systems Management, Band 19, 1-30, Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin. http://dx.doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-7147
|
Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career.
Morais, A.S., & Hariskos, W. (2018).
Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0206961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206961
|
How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions.
Mayer, S. J., & Rathmann, J. M. K. (2018).
How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1
|
Förderung und Evaluation der Forschung in den Lebenswissenschaften in der Schweiz – eine Interviewstudie.
Hendriks, B., Schendzielorz, C., & Reinhart, M. (2018).
Förderung und Evaluation der Forschung in den Lebenswissenschaften in der Schweiz – eine Interviewstudie. In The growth of science: Auswirkungen für die Forschungsevaluation und -förderung in der Schweiz. Politische Analyse und Empfehlungen des Schweizerischen Wissenschaftsrates SWR. Empirische Untersuchung von B. Hendriks, M. Reinhart und C. Schendzielorz, Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung (DZHW), Berlin. Politische Analyse 2/2018. Berlin: Schweizer Wissenschaftsrat.
|
Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016.
Neufeld, J., Johann, D. (2018).
Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016. Methoden- und Datenbericht. (Version 1.0.0). Hannover: fdz.DZHW.
|
Science and its Others: Examining the discourse about scientific misconduct through a postcolonial lens.
Hesselmann, F. (2018).
Science and its Others: Examining the discourse about scientific misconduct through a postcolonial lens. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 26(4), Taylor & Francis, 393-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2018.1538065
|
The dynamically changing publication universe as a reference point in national impact evaluation: A counterfactual case study on the Chinese publication growth.
Stahlschmidt, S., & Hinze, S. (2018).
The dynamically changing publication universe as a reference point in national impact evaluation: A counterfactual case study on the Chinese publication growth. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3:30.
|
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung.
Simons, A., Hendriks, B., Dirnagl, U., Riedel, N., Tölch, U., Ahmed, F., & Reinhart, M. (2018).
Wo und wie gelingt Translation? Einschätzungen aus der Praxis am Berliner Institut für Gesundheitsforschung. Forschung & Lehre, 25 (10).
|
Science Diplomacy in the European Union: Practices and Prospects.
Flink, T., & Rungius, C. (2018).
Science Diplomacy in the European Union: Practices and Prospects. Policy Brief No. 1.
|
The use of scientific literature in ISO standards.
Fenton, A., Blind. K., & Gauch, S. (2018).
The use of scientific literature in ISO standards. In Standards for a smarter future (EURAS Proceedings) (45-58). Dublin: Wissenschaftsverlag Mainz.
|
